Congress should either take preemptive federal environmental regulations and state laws, or the country’s energy producers continue to be impeded by climate-related lawsuits often sponsored by foreign financiers, allegedly in recent Senate hearings by the Chinese Communist Party.
Kansas Attorney General Chris Kobach said he has admitted he is a “strong enemy” with the preliminary goal if the higher levels of government eliminate or eliminate “first-take” actions or “first-take.”
“Congress must preempt state laws, and courts should read to find preemptive action between the lines of legislative law,” Kobach said at a June 25 hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee’s federal courts, oversights, agency litigation and federal rights committee.
The theme of the Trump administration’s push is to organize federal laws to make compliance cost-saving, time-consuming and confusing. It surprises the often redundant territory of federal, state, and local regulations related to environmental and energy production.
Kobach called on the senators to go beyond deregulation “to have a unified national policy.”
Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) said it is urgent to do so as it is said that Chinese-related entities are using the country’s courts to grant “the left legislation on the left against US energy control.”
“We are suing a systematic campaign against America’s energy, a coordinated attack by the radical left that has been supported and paid by the Chinese Communist Party, to take control of our courts and weaponize the lawsuit against US energy producers, all to undermine American energy control,” he said.
Cruz outlined “three extension attacks” led by “dark money entities linked to the Chinese Communist Party,” which influenced the campaign by “activist lawyers flooding our courts with lawsuits.”
Even more insidious, he said, is a coalition of seminars for concern scientists, with “secretly capturing and brainwashing the judicial institutions themselves,” “secretly capturing and brainwashing the judicial institutions themselves,” and “closed door training,” instructing the adoption of “climate law” ideological goals.
